Dementia and Intellectual Disabilities

Dementia and Intellectual Disabilities

Written by Craig Escudé, MD FAAFP, FAADM, September 2023.

Dementia can be a pretty scary thing for anyone. For people with disabilities, changes or a decline in cognitive functioning can be quite challenging to recognize, especially in people who do not use words to communicate.

When we are looking to diagnose dementia, clinicians frequently use tests like a mental status exam where a person is asked to remember lists of items, draw a picture of a clock with numbers on it, and recall current events like naming the current president and the city and state where they live.

For some with disabilities, questions like these may not have ever been able to be successfully answered due to a different baseline of knowledge and comprehension.

So how, then, can we attempt to accurately diagnose dementia in people with differing levels of cognitive baseline functioning? 

One way to do this is to look at changes in functional status over time. There is a tool developed by the National Task Group (NTG) on Intellectual Disabilities and Dementia Practices called the Early Detection and Screen for Dementia (EDSD) (i), which is specifically geared to help assess levels of functional decline over time in people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. This tool is designed to be used by family members and other supporters. Looking at serial measurements annually or every six months can help determine if a person is having a functional decline, but does this mean that the person definitely has dementia? No, it does not. Ruling out other causes for symptoms consistent with dementia is also very important. Mental health conditions, untreated sleep apnea, metabolic toxicity including alcohol, medication side effects, vitamin deficiencies, brain tumors, and thyroid, kidney, and liver disease can all present with signs resembling dementia. However, having the type of information that the EDSD can provide can be very helpful to a clinician in determining whether or not a person has evidence of dementia. When we see changes in cognition, we should never hastily conclude that it is due to dementia but instead look for treatable underlying causes such as those mentioned above. Working with a clinician knowledgeable about dementia in people with disabilities is advisable.

People with Down Syndrome are at a much higher risk of Alzheimer’s type dementia. People with Down Syndrome have an extra copy of chromosome 21, which also carries a gene responsible for producing a protein called amyloid precursor protein. Too much buildup of this protein in the brain leads to beta-amyloid plaques, which are implicated as a significant cause of Alzheimer’s disease. It is estimated that 50% or more of people with Down Syndrome will develop Alzheimer’s, and they are more likely to develop it earlier than those without Down Syndrome. It’s recommended that screening for dementia using a tool like the EDSD be started at age 40.

There have been significant advances in research on Alzheimer’s disease, including the development of blood tests and more sensitive brain scans that can help diagnose Alzheimer’s dementia. While these tests are currently not available everywhere, soon, we should have widespread availability of blood testing to diagnose the condition. There have also been advances in medication treatment options for dementia, and current trials are promising for the availability of effective treatment options in the near future. As with any new treatment, caution is warranted before starting medications, and one should always weigh the risk and benefits of treatment and include frank discussions with the clinician, the person for whom treatment is being considered, and the person’s support network to help ensure that the best decision is made for each individual person.

People who are supporting those with dementia also need support. The NTG also has a Family Support Committee. Activities of the committee include providing written and public comments on federal issues related to dementia, an inclusive, monthly, national online support group for family caregivers, and participating in a Facebook group for caregivers and professionals supporting individuals with Down Syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease. You can learn more about the NTG Family Support Committee by visiting www.the-ntg.org/family-caregivers.

Realizing that someone we love is showing signs of dementia can spark a wave of fear and anxiety. Ensuring a proper diagnosis, involving compassionate clinicians, and aligning ourselves with others facing similar situations can help us gain understanding and position ourselves to continue to grow and thrive in a life that, despite challenges, is filled with many joys and blessings.

Photo Credit: 2024 Rick Guidotti,Positive Exposure. All Rights Reserved. 

References: 

[i] National Task Group on Intellectual Disabilities and Dementia practices. NTG – Early Detection and Screen for Dementia. (NTG-EDSD)

[ii] National Institute on Aging. 2020. Alzheimer’s Disease in People With Down Syndrome

How Healthcare Technology Shapes the Lives of People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

How Healthcare Technology Shapes the Lives
of People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Written by Dr. Craig Escudé

People with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) experience numerous challenges accessing healthcare and receiving services and supports that result in poorer overall health, lower life expectancies, and reduced possibilities to live a full life of their choosing. Technological advances are facilitating earlier detection of illnesses that are often missed and improving health outcomes for a population with significant health disparities. These advances additionally have widespread applicability extending to people who are aging, people with cognitive decline, traumatic brain injury, and other differences.

Health Risk Informed Telemedicine™

The Health Risk Screening Tool (HRST) is a web-based application used to screen for health risks in people with IDD. Supporters of people with IDD answer simple health-related questions about the person they support, and the tool then provides a person-specific health risk profile to enlighten support teams and clinicians. Beyond identifying those risks, the HRST delivers action steps specific to the person’s risk profile that supporters utilize to mitigate those risks. Using this tool helps supporters to recognize signs of illness sooner and empowers them to act upon them with confidence. Earlier identification of health conditions leads to better outcomes.

In a new health model called Health Risk Informed Telemedicine™, IntellectAbility’s HRST risk profile technology is being integrated into telehealth companies’ electronic health record platforms like StationMD that provide vital telemedicine services to people with IDD. The telehealth clinician then has access to their patient’s most significant health risks, enabling them to make better-informed decisions about the person.

“Watch” That Seizure

Did you know your watch can detect seizures? Electronic watches with motion sensors can detect body movements consistent with seizure activity. They can alert staff or family members of the possible seizure and prompt a check-in on the person.

Improving Safety and Accuracy with Medication Usage

People with IDD often rely on medications to treat health conditions. Still, delivering those to the person can be complex, especially in enterprise settings like group homes and supported living arrangements when relying on others to assist in administration, record keeping, and other related processes.

Technology, through the use of apps tailored to IDD Residential workflows along with their app-connected medication boxes that only provide access to the right medications, at the right times, for the right people, can dramatically improve medication and regulatory compliance and independence for the individual.

Additionally, this technology, such as that from ImpruvonHealth, can drastically reduce the number of medication errors, improve safety, and reduce the time needed by nursing and direct support staff to deliver medication to the person.  

Monitoring From Afar

Remote monitoring systems can enable people who need extra support to live more independently. They may come in the form of web-connected alarms that can alert a support staff member if the oven is left on, if a smoke alarm goes off, and if a person falls. Or, they can prompt people to perform activities such as daily grooming or taking their medication at the right time, allowing them to live more independently without having someone in their home 24/7.

The independence gained from utilizing such supports can be life-changing to the person, allowing for more privacy and independence while still assuring safety. Companies like SimplyHome focus on using these remote supports to improve independence for people with IDD.

What Did You Say?

Everyone communicates. We may not all use words, but we all definitely communicate. People with IDD can frequently comprehend more than most people assume, but they may not be able to communicate effectively through speaking and writing. However, there are technological advances that improve their ability to communicate.

There are numerous devices that can facilitate communication, as well as apps that can be used on tablets and phones to assist someone who has a limited ability to use words to communicate to be able to type in words or utilize pictures to communicate more effectively with others.

Getting From Here to There

There are also apps that have been developed to assist people with IDD to navigate more successfully in their communities. Other apps can prompt them to stay on task and digitally connect to a virtual job coach when they need support at work. Apps like these help foster greater independence while reducing the need for paid, in-person support during these activities.

 

Technology is advancing in so many ways and at such a pace that one can only imagine the future. I encourage “techies” out there to give attention to research and development of technology related to improving health, wellness, freedom, and independence for some of society’s most at-risk. And to take it one step further, imagine what collaboration between these different technologies could offer.

Unlocking Behaviors: Gastrointestinal Distress

Unlocking Behaviors: Gastrointestinal Distress

Co-written by Risley “Ley” Linder, MA, MED, BCBA & Craig Escudé, MD, FAAFP, FAADM

This article is part of a co-authored series on behavioral presentations in which a physician and a behavior analyst provide insight into real-life case studies to share their expertise on how behavioral issues can be addressed in an interdisciplinary fashion.

Rick is a 43-year-old man with a moderate intellectual disability. He is very active and is described as a “high-energy” person. He was transferred to a new group home after his last one closed due to the inability to find enough staff to meet the needs of the people they supported. It was immediately noted by the new support team that Rick frequently searched for things to eat, and most of it was not food. He would look for objects on the ground, find whatever he could, and eat them. A repairman was working on the heater, and Rick managed to grab a small screw and swallow it before anyone could stop him. There was a tear in the vinyl flooring in his room, and staff noted one morning that the tear was a bit larger. Later, they saw him picking the flooring, breaking small pieces off, and eating them.

His staffing needs increased to monitor him more closely and prevent him from ingesting harmful objects. His level of aggression began to increase as staff would attempt to keep him from eating non-food items.

Photo Credit: 2023 Rick Guidotti, Positive Exposure. All Rights Reserved.

Medical Discussion

Eating things of non-nutritional value or non-food items is called pica. People may search for objects on the ground, pull stuff off the wall, or constantly search for some object to chew or swallow. It is more commonly seen in children, pregnant women, and people with conditions such as autism, intellectual disabilities, and schizophrenia. Many forms of pica involve one particular item that a person ingests. 

Examples include:

  • Chalk
  • Clay
  • Dirt
  • Coffee grounds
  • Ice
  • Paper.
pica definition examples

Sometimes pica is associated with underlying medical conditions. One of the more commonly seen conditions in the general population is iron deficiency which may be associated with an ice pica.

In people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, a condition that is noted to be commonly associated with pica behavior is gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). One suspected reason for this association is that a person learns that if they swallow more frequently, the acid that causes the pain is washed back into their stomach. They then begin looking for items to eat to stimulate salivation to wash down the acid.

Another commonly seen presentation of GERD is someone who likes to chew on a sock or other object. If you support someone who does this or has pica behavior, you might consider asking for an evaluation for GERD. They may be chewing to stimulate salivation to wash the acid down to relieve pain. Consideration should also be given to checking for Helicobacter Pylori infection, which has been implicated as a cause of GERD.

Behavioral Discussion

When examining pica behaviors, the first question is, “Are there immediate health and safety concerns?” As a few quick examples, is the person in immediate danger from consuming toxic chemicals, uncooked food, sharp items, or unknown items/substances? If so, medical assistance should be sought immediately.  

Second, “What is the historical dynamic of this behavior?”  

In the case of Rick, long-term pica behaviors can result from undiagnosed/untreated medical conditions in conjunction with learned behaviors that actually have logic in their engagement. 

To continue with Dr. Escudé’s point, if a person consumes the brittle, chalk-like substance comprising drywall, they can learn that this eases the discomfort in their stomach, throat, and mouth (e.g., GERD symptoms). The presentation we, as behavior analysts hear is, “They are eating the walls!”  In reality, they have found an “antacid” in their environment that is managing the discomfort they are experiencing.

Behaviorally, pica behaviors should be presumed to require a multidisciplinary approach until proven otherwise. The rare but eye-catching “Rapunzel Syndrome” illustrates how pica behaviors are complex and require insight from various professionals. The combination of trichotillomania (pulling out your hair) and trichophagia (chewing/consuming hair) requires a multi-faceted plan of care that requires behavioral management, psychiatric consultation for potential underlying diagnosis, routine primary care check-ups, and crisis management for potential medical needs – to name a few. 

Chronic pica behaviors can be reduced, particularly if the underlying cause is related to a medical condition. However, the person may still exhibit the pica behavior “out of habit.”   Using the example of a person consuming drywall, they have learned that this behavior effectively alleviates the discomfort they feel. At the beginning of treatment (e.g., taking medication), they may continue to engage in the behavior, as they have to learn that taking medication is a more effective means of reducing discomfort. The person should be monitored after the introduction of a medication to see if the behavior decreases, stops, or even increases, as the medication type, dosing, or other factors may not be the “right fit.”  In other words, if the medication is ineffective in reducing the discomfort, the pica behavior will likely continue. 

If the behavior abates after the introduction of any intervention (e.g., medical and/or behavior) but suddenly re-appears, there could be an acute stimulus that is exacerbating the existing diagnosis and should be evaluated by a medical professional. The pica behavior should also be considered as potentially indicating other medical concerns as the person may have generalized the pica behaviors using the logic, “Well, this helped me the last time my stomach hurt.”

Outcome

Thanks to an astute direct support professional and a responsive team that was aware of the association between pica and GERD, Rick was taken to see a gastroenterologist who performed an endoscopy. He noted numerous gastric and esophageal erosions consistent with GERD. Rick was started on a proton pump inhibitor, and over the next several weeks, his pica behavior slowly lessened. His suffering from GERD symptoms, his overall health risk, and the need for additional staffing were all reduced, resulting in improved quality of life for Rick, his supporters, and the support agency.

Author Bio: 

Ley is a Board-Certified Behavior Analyst with an academic and professional background in gerontology and applied behavior analysis. Ley’s specialties include behavioral gerontology and the behavioral presentations of neurocognitive disorders, in addition to working with high-management behavioral needs for dually diagnosed persons with intellectual disabilities and mental illness. He is an officer on the Board of Directors for the National Task Group on Intellectual Disabilities and Dementia Practices, works closely with national organizations such as the National Down Syndrome Society, and is the owner/operator of Crescent Behavioral Health Services based in Columbia, SC. 

Dr. Craig Escudé is a board-certified Fellow of the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American Academy of Developmental Medicine and President of IntellectAbility. He has over 20 years of clinical experience providing medical care for people with IDD and complex medical and mental health conditions. He is the author of “Clinical Pearls in IDD Healthcare” and developer of the “Curriculum in IDD Healthcare,” an eLearning course used to train clinicians on the fundamentals of healthcare for people with IDD. He is also the host of the “IDD Health Matters” podcast.

Bullying: How You Can Take Action To Identify, Address and Prevent This Destructive Behavior

Sept. Article banner

Written by Lorene Reagan, RN, MS
Published in the August 2023 edition of EP (Exceptional Parent) Magazine. Sign up for this newsletter for free!

As we prepare to return to school, it is critical to ensure all children, including those with disabilities, are in an environment where they can learn, grow, and socialize without fear. This article describes bullying, its consequences, the increased risk children and adults with disabilities face, and prevention strategies.

WHAT IS BULLYING?

Bullying behavior is characterized by unwanted, aggressive behavior that involves a real or perceived power imbalance and is repeated or has the potential to be repeated over time. There are many different types of bullying, ranging from teasing and harassment to actual physical violence. It can occur in person, in writing, or through cyberbullying involving online or cell phone communications.

The magnitude of bullying behavior varies from annoying and emotionally hurtful verbal abuse, distressing social bullying designed to damage a person’s reputation, publicly embarrass or isolate them, to bullying involving physical assault. It’s not uncommon for bullying to begin with verbal taunting and harassment and then, if not addressed, escalate into physical abuse and assault. And people with intellectual and developmental disabilities are susceptible to and at even greater risk than others with disabilities of being bullied.

WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES OF BULLYING?

We all know bullying hurts people in many ways. But did you know:

  • Bullying has serious negative consequences; those who are bullied can experience depression, low self-esteem, decreased academic achievement, health problems, and, in extreme cases, can be at risk for suicide[i].
  • People with disabilities can be bullied by family members, paid and unpaid caregivers, and other supporters, and may be reluctant to report it because of their dependence upon the caregiver and fear of retribution.

The adverse outcomes of bullying are not limited to those who are bullied. According to the US Department of Health and Human Services,[ii] children who are allowed to bully others are more likely to:

  • Abuse alcohol and other substances as adolescents and adults
  • Drop out of school, vandalize property, and engage in fighting
  • Engage in sexual activity earlier
  • Have criminal convictions and be abusive toward others, including their romantic partners, spouses, and children as adults

And those who witness bullying are more likely to:

  • Miss or skip school
  • Have increased mental health challenges, including depression and anxiety
  • Have increased use of tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs

Bullying directed at a person because of their disability may fall under the category of “disability harassment” and rise to the level of a civil rights violation under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 or Title II or III of the Americans with Disabilities Act[iii]. Those who harass people because of their disability, as well as people and organizations who have a duty to prevent disability harassment, can run afoul of these laws if they fail to address and prevent bullying and harassment appropriately.

WHAT CAN WE DO TO PREVENT BULLYING?

We know that the roots of bullying behavior begin in childhood. According to the American Psychological Association,[iv] steps can be taken to address and prevent bullying. For example:

  • Create an environment that makes it clear bullying will not be tolerated and set positive expectations for both children and adults.
  • Ensure parents, educators, and others in the person’s life are knowledgeable and observant about when and where bullying tends to happen. Bullying generally occurs in areas where supervision is limited or absent such as in bathrooms, playrooms, parks, and on school buses. Cyberbullying via cell phones and computers occurs when access to these devices is not monitored.
  • Be alert to the safety of those most vulnerable to being bullied. Help the person develop a network of allies to reduce feelings of isolation and reduce opportunities for the person to be targeted for bullying.
  • If bullying is reported or observed, intervene immediately to stop it, record the incident and inform those responsible for addressing it.
  • Adults, including parents, educators, and others, are encouraged to be involved in school or community-based safety teams and antibullying task forces and engage and educate children and adults with (and without) disabilities about the skills for identifying, responding to, and preventing bullying.

Bullying has long-ranging consequences for those being bullied, the person exhibiting the bullying behavior, and those who are witnesses to this serious form of mistreatment. Taking steps to recognize, address and prevent bullying is critical to all children and adults’ emotional and physical well-being. And it is especially important for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, who are at the highest risk for this type of abuse.  

[i] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. People with Disabilities and Chronic Diseases: Information about Bullying. 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandsafety/bullying.html

 

[ii] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Bullying and Youth with Disabilities and Special Health Needs. 2020. https://www.stopbullying.gov/bullying/special-needs

 

[iii] US Department of Justice Civil Rights Division. Guide to Disability Rights Laws. 2020. https://www.ada.gov/resources/disability-rights-guide/

 

[iv] American Psychological Association. Bullying. 2022. https://www.apa.org/topics/bullying/prevent

Unlocking Behaviors: Dental Health

Unlocking Behaviors: Dental Health

Co-written by Risley “Ley” Linder, MA, MED, BCBA & Craig Escudé, MD, FAAFP, FAADM
Published by Helen Journal

This article is part of a co-authored series on behavioral presentations in which a physician and a behavior analyst provide insight into real-life case studies to share their expertise on how behavioral issues can be addressed in an interdisciplinary fashion.

When it came to tennis, 37-year-old Tim was a huge fan. He loved watching how fast the players hit the ball back and forth, especially his favorite player Roger Federer. He knew the general timing of the US Open and other major tennis events and would watch as many matches as possible.

Tim enjoyed snacking on almonds and other nuts while watching tennis. One year, during the US Open, he decided he didn’t  want almonds and even knocked them off the table a couple of times. He began to get a bit agitated at various times of the day or night, and his support staff wasn’t sure  what was going on. After a few weeks, Tim became quite a challenge, hitting out at others, wanting to stay in his room more, and even eating less.

Tim was taken to his primary care physician for an evaluation. He underwent a physical exam, and nothing unusual was found except for a 5-pound weight loss since his last visit six months prior. Because of his agitation, he was then seen by a psychiatrist. Staff were concerned that he was endangering himself and others during his episodes of agitation. He was started on psychotropic medication in an attempt to reduce his aggression. It seemed to work for a while, but then the agitation ramped up again. After several psychiatry visits and medication adjustments, the recommendation was made to move Tim to an in-patient psychiatric setting for evaluation.

A relatively new nurse who had recently attended a conference about behavioral changes in people due to underlying medical conditions attended Tim’s final team meeting before he was to be committed. She recalled hearing at the conference how dental issues can cause agitation. She recognized that Tim had not had a dental evaluation in the last three years because of COVID restrictions and his inability to wear a mask. 

Medical Discussion

Primary care physicians are not dentists. (No surprise there). But in the situation described above, primary care clinicians are often asked to evaluate a person with a change in behavior to rule out underlying medical causes. Most people, if they have tooth pain, automatically know to see a dentist and don’t show up at the family physician’s office for an evaluation. But for many people with a limited ability to use words to communicate, agitation is often the first indicator of discomfort, and the initial assessment is usually by a primary care clinician or a psychiatrist. Primary care clinicians aren’t necessarily used to thinking about dental causes of pain because most people will go to the dentist first. 

Anything that causes pain in a person’s mouth can make them agitated around mealtimes (due to the anticipation of pain with chewing). They can also spit out food, prefer soft foods over crunchy foods, refuse to go to the dinner table, refuse oral care, and can even be aggressive.

Behavioral Discussion

Tim’s decreased desire to snack on nuts and watch the greatest tennis player of all time is an entirely preventable situation. Dr. Escudé listed a few behaviors that can happen when a person has pain and/or discomfort in their mouth. It’s  important to recognize these types of behaviors, but Tim’s situation allows us to discuss another area of behavior: acute vs. chronic behaviors. 

Acute vs. Chronic Behaviors

Tim’s preference for snacking on nuts and watching tennis is something that had occurred for many years, and there was an acute change in behavior.

Tim’s acute change in behavior was characterized by changes in:

  • Preferences
  • Routines
  • Medical issues, such as unintended weight loss. 

Sudden changes in behavior and/or new behaviors are more likely to happen because of changes in a person’s environment (e.g., new job) or medical issues (e.g., toothache), as opposed to more chronic issues (e.g., psychiatric symptoms). 

For Tim, having never been prescribed psychotropic medications, the acute onset of psychiatric symptoms in middle age is not a likely cause for the change in food and activity preferences.  

Observing and Assessing

When observing and assessing acute onset behaviors, thinking about three key areas is important. 

  1. First, has anything changed in their environment? Can we clearly identify a change that would account for the rapid change in preferences? 
  2. Second, what is the timeline of changes? When did the behavior change(s) start? Sometimes using events instead of time to track changes can be helpful. For example, “Tim was eating nuts while watching Wimbledon in July, but he wasn’t during the US Open in August. What could have happened in the last month?”  
  3. Lastly, it’s important to note if the behaviors happen across time, setting, and people. If they only happen at one particular time, in a specific setting, or with certain people, they are more likely to be environmental, as opposed to medical-based behaviors that are more likely to happen across time, settings, and people.  
Outcome

The nurse recalled what she learned at the conference and recommended that Tim have a dental evaluation before being admitted to the psychiatric hospital. Tim was found to have several abscessed teeth. After they were all treated, his pain resolved. They tapered off his psychotropic medication, and he made up for all the tennis he missed— and the eating. Tim avoided a psychiatric admission and likely additional psychotropic medicines because of the nurses’ insistence on a dental evaluation. 

The Authors

Risley “Ley” Linder 
Ley is a Board-Certified Behavior Analyst with an academic and professional background in gerontology and applied behavior analysis. Ley’s specialties include behavioral gerontology and the behavioral presentations of neurocognitive disorders, in addition to working with high-management behavioral needs for dually diagnosed persons with intellectual disabilities and mental illness. He is an officer on the Board of Directors for the National Task Group on Intellectual Disabilities and Dementia Practices, works closely with national organizations such as the National Down Syndrome Society, and is the owner/operator of Crescent Behavioral Health Services based in Columbia, SC.

Dr. Craig Escudé
Dr. Craig Escudé is a board-certified Fellow of the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Developmental Medicine, and President of IntellectAbility. He has more than 20 years of clinical experience providing medical care for people with IDD and complex medical and mental health conditions. He is the author of “Clinical Pearls in IDD Healthcare and developer of the Curriculum in IDD Healthcare,” an eLearning course used to train clinicians on the fundamentals of healthcare for people with IDD.

Clinical Pearls in IDD Healthcare that are Important Knowledge for DSPs

Clinical Pearls in IDD Healthcare that are Important Knowledge for DSPs

As co-published by National Alliance for Direct Support Professionals (NADSP) and Research and Training Center on Community Living (RTC-CL) in the Frontline Initiative.

By Craig Escudé, MD, FAAFP, FAADM, President of IntellectAbility 

I started practicing in the field of healthcare for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) in the 1990s. I very quickly realized how little I knew about this field. I found myself being responsible for the healthcare of hundreds of people with IDD without fully understanding many concepts that I later learned were important. Most health professional schools do not provide training about the healthcare needs of people with IDD. 

A “clinical pearl” is a small bit of freestanding, clinically-relevant information based on experience or observation. I thought I’d share with you a few of them that might be very relevant to your role as a DSP.

Over the next several years, I learned much about the health needs of people with disabilities. I learned this information from people I worked with, including many nurses and direct support professionals who had worked in this field for many years. Like I did, they also had to learn things “the hard way” through trial and error, and from other, more seasoned support staff. I took many concepts I had learned and jotted them down into a book called Clinical Pearls in IDD Healthcare. A “clinical pearl” is a small bit of freestanding, clinically-relevant information based on experience or observation. I thought I’d share with you a few of them that might be very relevant to your role as a DSP.

2023 Rick Guidotti, Positive Exposure. All rights reserved. 

Clinical Pearl: Quality of Life

A different quality of life doesn’t mean a lower quality of life. In my practice, I’ve seen people placed in hospice care solely because of their intellectual disability diagnoses. I’ve often been asked, “Why is this person not a DNR [do not resuscitate]?” by clinicians assuming that the person has a poor quality of life simply because they have a disability. In the recent COVID pandemic, we’ve all seen people deprioritized from lifesaving measures, such as intensive care unit (ICU) beds or ventilators, based solely on the fact that a person has a disability. We should not judge the quality of life of another person based on our own definition of what we think that quality of life is.

Clinical Pearl: Documenting the Baseline Level of Functioning of People with IDD

To know if there is a change, we must first know the person’s baseline. A baseline is what the person is currently doing or where they are with a skill. One of the primary indications that a person may be experiencing a medical condition is a change in the person’s level of consciousness or ability to do something. But if we are unaware of the person’s baseline and cannot communicate that person’s baseline to a clinician, subtle changes may go unrecognized. 

For instance, if we know that a person is usually able to eat independently and then begins to need assistance to eat, there could be a medical or dental cause, such as a tooth abscess. But if the person’s baseline is not known, supporters and healthcare professionals may not recognize this change in the person’s level of functioning. For each person you support, make sure you know the baseline level of activity and function – how do they usually do things in their day-to-day lives? It is important that you as a DSP, who knows the person you support, can communicate that baseline to others to facilitate better healthcare outcomes.

Clinical Pearl: Medical Causes for Behaviors in People with IDD

A behavior change is often a sign of an underlying, treatable medical condition. I have often seen new behaviors being attributed to a person’s disability rather than potentially being caused by underlying pain or the onset of a medical condition. A psychological evaluation of the new behavior often follows, frequently resulting in adding a new medication to control the behavior. Numerous medical conditions cause behavioral changes in people unable to communicate with words.

Whenever there is a change in a person’s behavior, one should consider the possibility of underlying pain or a medical condition first.

As a DSP, it is important that you document the behavior, where it happens, and when. This type of information can be critical to other practitioners in finding the root cause of the issue.

Some of the more frequent medical conditions I’ve encountered that have caused behavioral changes in people with IDD include:

  • Undiagnosed dental abscesses causing aggression at mealtimes
  • Sinus infections causing head banging
  • Constipation causing aggression or refusal to eat
  • Urinary tract infections causing agitation and screaming in the bathroom
  • Chest pain where the person was thought to be experiencing panic attacks when they’re actually having angina.

Clinical Pearl: PICA Behavior in People with IDD

Did you know that pica can be associated with gastroesophageal reflux? 

“Pica” is a term used to describe when people eat things of non-nutritional value. People may search for objects on the ground, pull stuff off the wall, or constantly search for some object to chew or swallow. In many cases, this behavior is due to gastroesophageal reflux disease. One suspected reason is that a person learns that if they swallow more frequently, the acid that causes the pain is washed back into their stomach. 

They then begin looking for things to eat to stimulate salvation and swallowing to wash down the acid. Another commonly-seen presentation is someone who likes to chew on a sock or other object. If you support someone who does this, you might consider asking for an evaluation for gastroesophageal reflux disease. They may be chewing to stimulate salivation to wash the acid down to relieve their pain.

Clinical Pearl: The Impact of Active Movement on Bowel Function

Constipation is a big problem for many people with IDD. Any movement involving large muscle groups will inevitably assist with bowel function. One of the things we tell people to do after surgery is to get up and walk around as soon as possible. The reason for this is because walking around can help stimulate bowel function. However, some people with significant physical limitations cannot get up and walk. But did you know that sitting or lying in certain positions can help with bowel function? Being in a prone or belly-down position with proper supports can help stimulate bowel function. 

There’s a position called “quadruped on forearms,” where a person is supported using wedges. I’ve included an image of this position in this article. Some people who cannot walk may be supported in this position. Others may be able to stand using assistive devices. You can speak up for the people you support if the practitioner is not familiar with supporting people with limited mobility. Consulting with a physical or occupational therapist can often help identify ways to stimulate movement that can help improve bowel function.

These are just a few examples of many clinical pearls I’ve learned throughout my years in practice. If you’re interested in learning more, purchase the book Clinical Pearls in IDD Healthcare.

New Reports to help you Advocate for Health Equity for People with Disabilities

New Reports to Help You Advocate for Health Equity for People with Disabilities

Published by EP Magazine | February 2023
By Craig Escudé, ME, FAAFP, FAADM

In the last year, we have seen three significant announcements relating to improving healthcare for people with disabilities, including those with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD).

In this article, I’ll summarize all three. That’s my part. Your part as advocates for people with IDD is to use this information to inform legislators, physician groups, hospitals, insurance plans, managed care organizations, medical schools, nursing schools, dental schools, medical licensure boards, and other healthcare entities to TAKE ACTION to incorporate training and education for students, optimize physical environments to make them more accessible, and to build a healthcare system where people with IDD can receive equitable healthcare.

Source One: The National Council on Disability

February 2022 – The Release of the National Council on Disability’s Framework for Health Equity for People with Disabilities.

The NCD’s framework “provides a roadmap for fixing systemic barriers within our healthcare system and references many examples of the well-documented health disparities and inequities that demand action for over 61 million people with disabilities.”  The framework calls for five significant changes and thirty-eight other recommended changes to foster health equity for all. The five core components include:

  1. Designating people with disabilities as a Special Medically Underserved Population (SMUP) under the Public Health Services Act
  2. Designating people with disabilities as a Health Disparity Population under the Minority Health and Health Disparities Research and Education Act
  3. Requiring comprehensive disability clinical-care curricula in all US medical, nursing, and other healthcare professional schools and requiring disability competency education and training of medical, nursing, and other healthcare professionals
  4. Requiring the use of accessible medical and diagnostic equipment
  5. Improving data collection concerning healthcare for people with disabilities across the lifespan.

The additional thirty-eight items cover a wide range of recommendations, including making medical offices “sensory-friendly,” creating an “essential disability benefits” list of home and community-based services, mandating Medicare coverage for many services specifically beneficial to people with disabilities, including dental coverage, and mandating that health plans include a person with a disability in the peer review process for claims, among others.

Source Two: The Joint Commission

June 2022 – The Joint Commission issues Sentinel Event Alert 65: Diagnostic Overshadowing Among Groups Experiencing Health Disparities

The Joint Commission is the premier global driver of healthcare quality improvement and patient safety. They accredit organizations through an objective process that helps healthcare organizations measure, assess, and improve their performance, focusing on assisting them to deliver safe and high-quality healthcare. They issue Sentinel Event Alerts whenever a particular danger is identified that can impact health and safety. 

In June 2022, they issued a sentinel event alert on diagnostic overshadowing. Diagnostic overshadowing is a term used to describe a situation where a particular sign or symptom a person is exhibiting is attributed to the person’s IDD diagnosis rather than looking for a potentially treatable underlying cause. This type of misdiagnosis can have a significant negative impact on the person. Imagine if someone who does not use words to communicate is experiencing pain from a dental abscess and can only express that pain by hitting herself on the cheek over and over. To the untrained eye, this behavior might be attributed to the intellectual disability rather than looking for an underlying cause. The person might suffer for weeks, months, or even years without ever receiving a proper diagnosis causing significant physical and emotional trauma to the person.

Source Three: The World Health Organization

December 2022 – The World Health Organization (WHO) releases its Global Report on Health Equity for Persons with Disabilities.

The WHO estimates that 1.3 billion people experience a significant disability worldwide. This estimate includes those with IDD. Their 296-page report calls for change to the overall healthcare system to promote health equity for people with disabilities. 

One of the points is that achieving health equity for people with disabilities benefits society as a whole, including older people, people who experience temporary limitations, and people living with chronic conditions. There are calls for “transformative disability conscious medical education, training and practice,” which, instead of focusing on “curing the abnormal,” would present disability as one of many diversity factors around which a range of structural barriers and systemic disadvantages influence health outcomes.” This comprehensive report contains numerous recommendations to achieve health equity for people with IDD. 

Use these reports in your advocacy to work towards improving health equity for people with disabilities. 

Think of the connections you have developed with people in positions to make changes. Print these out and deliver them to clinicians you visit. Email these links to legislators and licensing boards. Call your legislators and inquire if they are aware of these reports. 

As the collective voice of people with IDD, advocates, self-advocates, families, and health professionals grows, 
it will become a driving force for change.

Unlocking Behaviors: Head-Banging

Unlocking Behaviors: Head-Banging

Co-written by Risley “Ley” Linder, MA, MED, BCBA & Craig Escudé, MD, FAAFP, FAADM
Published by Helen Journal

This article is part of a co-authored series on behavioral presentations in which a physician and a behavior analyst provide insight into real-life case studies to share their expertise on how behavioral issues can be addressed in an interdisciplinary fashion. 

Sarah is a 45-year-old woman with a severe intellectual disability. She has lived in the same group home for 12 years, longer than any of her current support staff has worked there.

She is described as mostly cooperative but not very interactive with others. She does not use words to communicate but can usually indicate her preferences and needs with gestures. She is a picky eater, and her support staff has reported that occasionally, Sarah will hit herself in the head or hit her head on a nearby firm surface, such as a wall or table. She has exhibited this behavior intermittently for as long as they have known her. It appears to be “just want Sarah does, sometimes,” and hasn’t been looked into much further.

A couple of times a year, Sarah has been noted to have an upper respiratory tract infection, but overall is healthy. She sees her doctor annually for a physical exam, which is often limited because she will become agitated and hit her head. She sees the dentist twice a year, but, again, she receives minimal intervention because of her agitation.

Medical Discussion

Head-banging behavior can have several etiologies but should never be seen as “just something that people with IDD do.” Even when someone has done this for many years, there still may be a treatable underlying cause.

Some people have what I call a “limited repertoire” of actions or responses to distress or pain. Just because someone is banging her head in response to pain does not always mean that the pain is in a part of their head. For instance, a person may exhibit head-banging behavior as their primary means of expressing discomfort in any part of their body, including if they have an ingrown toenail. They may also exhibit that same behavior in response to social or environmental distress as well. That said, let’s talk about common medical causes of head pain that might trigger agitation or self-injurious behavior.

When looking for a cephalic cause of discomfort, I try to think of the possibility of it coming from “any hole in a person’s head.” Let’s look at them. 

  1. Eyes—glaucoma, a foreign body, conjunctivitis. 
  2. Ears— foreign body, cerumen impaction, otitis externa, otitis media, middle ear effusion.
  3. Nose—foreign body, sinusitis, allergic rhinitis.
  4. Mouth—dental abscess, dental caries, pharyngitis, ulcers, tongue or lip trauma from an accidental, self-inflicted bite.
  5. Other types of head-related discomfort include various types of headaches, scalp lesions, vision disturbances, or hearing disturbances.

I’m probably leaving out a few, but the idea is to think about all possible causes of pain or discomfort that could be causing a behavior change. Once all medical causes have been ruled out, it’s time to look for other potential reasons, including those from social, environmental, and behavioral perspectives.

Behavioral Discussion

Behaviorally, the presentation of head-banging and other forms of self-abuse can be confounding for caregivers and practitioners alike. Sarah’s head-banging presentation brings to light three primary areas of focus:

  • The function(s) of the behavior
  • Temporal dimensions
  • Potential medical concerns, as already noted.

In behavior analysis, we work to identify the function of (or reason for) behavior, which we categorize into four primary areas:

  1. Access to attention
  2. Access to items/activities
  3. Escape/avoidance
  4. Sensory (e.g., pain attenuation).

In the context of potential medical concerns, Sarah’s periodic head-banging could be related to pain attenuation/discomfort for recurrent respiratory infections. Further expounded, head-banging behaviors could also be impacted by the inability to have more comprehensive medical exams and preventative care, such as going to the dentist, which can lead to poor oral health and painful dental issues.


Sarah has been noted to engage in head-banging behaviors in two scenarios: intermittently at home and at medical appointments. As with most behaviors, they do not have a singular function, and although the behavior may look the same across time, settings, and people, the behavior can serve different functions. In Sarah’s case, we need to rule out possible medical causes (sensory function) but also address head-banging behavior when attending medical appointments (escape/avoidance function). In other words, we have identified one behavior but two functions, which means we will need multiple (at least two!) strategies/interventions to address Sarah’s head-banging behavior.

Of note when reviewing Sarah’s head-banging behaviors is the mention that the behavior is intermittent and she is a picky eater. Intermittent self-abusive behavior, only occurring two to three times a year, supports the notion of an acute medical condition, as opposed to self-abusive behavior that occurs at high rates or frequencies, which could lean towards a possible self-stimulatory function. Of particular interest, behaviorally, the staff mentioned she is a picky eater. Colloquially, being a picky eater is based on likes and dislikes. However, what if being a picky eater is rooted in aversion (because of pain)? For example, “Sarah always eats pudding at snack time, but sometimes she refuses to eat cookies, which we know she likes.” Is Sarah periodically refusing cookies because they are crunchy and avoiding them due to pain and discomfort while eating? These temporal dynamics of when the behavior is occurring over time, the time of day (e.g., “Is head-banging more likely to occur at mealtime?”), and other changes in behavior (e.g., food preferences) are all components a behavior analyst would examine.

From a future programming perspective, addressing the barriers impeding successful routine medical appointments (e.g., physician and dentist) would be beneficial. Sarah was noted to not be interactive with others, and communication deficits may be impacting her globally in that she is unable to effectively communicate pain and discomfort, but also stress and anxiety related to medical appointments. Increasing her ability to communicate effectively, instead of head-banging behaviors, and eliminating barriers to preventative medical care, are fundamental for Sarah’s long-term health and quality of life.

Outcome
As it turns out, Sarah was seen by the dentist and was noted to have yet another dental abscess. Her teeth were in exceedingly poor overall condition. After careful consideration and discussion with her support team and family, the decision was made for her to undergo a full mouth extraction. Indeed, the better option would have been for her to have been able to receive proper preventive and restorative care throughout her life, and I’ll leave that to my dental colleagues to discuss in more detail. However, for Sarah, this was felt to be the best option.

After Sarah healed from her surgery, she began eating much better and was smiling more, and the incidence of her head-banging behavior dropped by 90 percent. This points to the likelihood that she had been experiencing significant dental pain for years.

While this was a heart-breaking case, it’s all too common. Remember that just because someone has always had a particular behavior, it does not mean it’s not due to an underlying, treatable cause.

The Authors

Ley Linder is a Board-Certified Behavior Analyst with an academic and professional background in gerontology and applied behavior analysis. Ley’s specialties include behavioral gerontology and the behavioral presentations of neurocognitive disorders, in addition to working with high-management behavioral needs for dually diagnosed persons with intellectual disabilities and mental illness. He is an officer on the Board of Directors for the National Task Group on Intellectual Disabilities and Dementia Practices, works closely with national organizations such as the National Down Syndrome Society, and is the owner/operator of Crescent Behavioral Health Services based in Columbia, SC.

Dr. Craig Escudé is a board-certified Fellow of the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American Academy of Developmental Medicine and is the President of IntellectAbility. He has more than 20 years of clinical experience providing medical care for people with IDD and complex medical and mental health conditions. He is the author of “Clinical Pearls in IDD Healthcare” and developer of the “Curriculum in IDD Healthcare”, an eLearning course used to train clinicians on the fundamentals of healthcare for people with IDD.

Health-related Resources for people with IDD and Their Supporters

Health-related Resources for People with IDD and Their Supporters

By Craig Escudé, MD, FAAFP, FAADM
Published by EP Magazine  |  January 2023

With significant health disparities noted in people with IDD, it is important that people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), their supporters, and healthcare providers educate themselves on the different health risks that are more commonly seen in people with IDD and about what can be done to prevent serious complications. Supporters and healthcare providers are often challenged in finding helpful information related to healthcare for people with IDD. As a physician who started practicing in this field in the 1990s, finding clinically relevant information about healthcare for people with IDD was challenging. Fortunately, over the past several years, more resources have been developed that relate specifically to healthcare issues and improving health equity for people with IDD. In this article, you’ll find a listing of websites, tools, and training available to provide information and guidance to you, whether a family member, paid supporter, healthcare provider, or person with IDD.

 

Books

Clinical Pearls in IDD Healthcare provides easy-to-understand and clinically relevant information to clinicians and supporters of people with IDD. The book is centered on “clinical pearls,” which are small bits of free-standing, clinically relevant information based on experience or observation. They are part of the vast domain of experience-based medicine and can be helpful in dealing with clinical problems for which controlled data do not exist.
You will find 1-2 page documents covering 55 health-related conditions commonly seen in people with IDD. Topics include medical causes of adverse behavior, sexuality, quality of life, end-of-life care, dental care, polypharmacy, common preventable cause of illness, aging with IDD, and much more. The guide is used by physicians, supporters, nurses, and family members to gain an understanding of the many health issues that are more common in people with IDD. For family members, it can be helpful for self-education but also as a means to provide concise information to physicians who may appreciate additional clinical details related to IDD healthcare.

Electronic Learning Courses

For clinicians looking to receive additional training in IDD Healthcare, the Curriculum in IDD Healthcare is a web-based Continuing Medical Education-approved eLearning course that teaches the fundamentals of IDD healthcare that were likely not taught in clinical training programs. It’s a 6 module, self-paced course that has been studied and shown to significantly improve clinicians’ clinical confidence in providing healthcare to people with IDD. It’s currently used in medical and nursing schools and by practicing clinicians throughout the United States.

The Fatal Five eLearning courses are excellent programs that teach learners about the top preventable causes of illness and death in people with IDD. The specific topics covered in these 7-module courses include discussions about aspiration, dehydration, seizures, bowel obstruction, sepsis, and gastroesophageal reflux, as well as a discussion on knowing when to act to avoid serious complications. The Fatal Five Fundamentals is geared to teach direct support professionals and family members about these topics. The Fatal Five Advanced course teaches about the same conditions at a more clinical level, which is great for nurses.

 

Websites

Special Olympics has a webpage dedicated to health resources for people with IDD. Topics include Health Promotion, Fitness, Health Smiles (dentistry), and many other health and wellness resources.
The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development has an extensive list of IDD health resources for patients, healthcare providers, and researchers. You’ll find general and condition-specific information, including links to related entities such as the Association for University Centers on Disabilities.
The Vanderbilt Kennedy IDD Toolkit is an excellent resource guide for clinicians and others relating to several common genetic conditions often associated with IDD. In addition to general guidance, there is specific guidance for health screening about conditions like Autism, Down Syndrome, Fragile X, Prader-Willi, and other conditions, as well as a number of valuable resources relating to topics such as informed consent, communication, and behavioral health.

Organizations

There are two organizations for healthcare providers that offer resources online and provide educational opportunities at their annual conferences. The American Academy of Developmental Medicine and Dentistry focuses on physicians and dentists and the Developmental Disabilities Nurses Association for nurses. Both organizations are excellent resources where providers can enhance their skills and knowledge in providing IDD healthcare and collaborate with others in the field.
Several organizations provide valuable information about specific genetic conditions and syndrome, including the Prader-Willi Syndrome Association, the National Association for Down Syndrome, the National Autism Association, the Autism Society of America, the National Fragile X Foundation, the Angelman Syndrome Foundation, and others. Many of these societies have information tailored to supporters, family members, healthcare providers, and researchers relating to their specific syndrome.

Finding Additional Resources

The internet is filled with resources, but not all are what I’d call “good.” And some contain misinformation or are more based on people’s opinions rather than what is generally considered acceptable and reliable health-related information. When looking for resources, I’d recommend going to websites that are from known entities such as well-known hospital systems, governmental agencies like the CDC and the NIH, or official websites for whatever you are looking for. I also recommend reaching out to people you know in your community to see what resources they recommend. Talk to trusted physicians and nurses or call your local hospital to see if there might recommend a particular resource.

Final Thoughts

I’m sure that there are many excellent resources I have left out. But hopefully, the ones listed here will be useful to many. Educating ourselves about our health and the health of the people we support can help us make better-informed decisions, which can dampen the anxiety and fear we might face when dealing with health challenges.

 

About the author:

Dr. Craig Escudé is a board-certified Fellow of the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American Academy of Developmental Medicine and is the President of IntellectAbility. He has more than 20 years of clinical experience providing medical care for people with IDD and complex medical and mental health conditions serving as medical director of Hudspeth Regional Center in Mississippi for most of that time. While there, he founded DETECT, the Developmental Evaluation, Training, and Educational Consultative Team of Mississippi. He is the author of “Clinical Pearls in IDD Healthcare” and developer of the “Curriculum in IDD Healthcare,” an eLearning course used to train clinicians on the fundamentals of healthcare for people with IDD.

The Health Risk Screening Tool (HRST): Aspiration

Why Doesn’t the HRST Concern Itself with Aspiration?

Actually, it does.

Several of the Rating Items on the HRST cover each of the areas of risk associated with aspiration.  

Item A. Eating – Identifies those who are fed via a tube or have significant risks or supports in place to eat safely.  

Item B. Ambulation – (Yes, Ambulation) tells you who needs significant support to maintain a seated position due to significant physical deformity or problems with trunk control.  

Item G. Self-Abuse – Looks at behaviors like rumination, hand-mouthing, pica, food stuffing, or any other behaviors that place the person at risk of an aspiration event.  

Item K. Gastrointestinal (GI) Conditions -Focuses on those who have such conditions as GERD or who have behaviors that may indicate unidentified reflux.  

Item P. Nutrition – Identifies several factors, including unplanned weight loss and suspicious lab values, which may indicate that a person has issues that would predispose them to respond poorly to an aspiration event. The person will have a score of 4 in this Rating Item if they have had one or more hospitalizations for aspiration within the last year.  

And if they had a severe occurrence, Rating Item Q may be scored due to the interventions needed to care for the person following the incident. 


Don’t forget the HRST Considerations! Once the Rating Items are accurately scored, the problem is half-managed. 

One of the unique features of the HRST is that once it spots trouble, it generates a plethora of helpful suggestions in the form of Service and Training Considerations. When a person receives a score on any of the above-mentioned items, HRST Considerations are generated to support the team in guiding the person out of harm’s way. These include assistance from appropriate professionals and training of direct caregivers in areas like positioning and seating, behavioral supports, mealtime planning, returning to oral feeding when possible, and many, MANY others.  

If you have concerns about a person for whom you provide services, please take time to review the HRST Considerations. If you have questions our clinical support staff is available to discuss these concerns with you at your convenience.  

Request a demonstration and price quote of the HRST today!